Posts Tagged ‘revision’

I Have A Story Up at Storychord! Yayness All Around!

20130417-105604.jpg

Here’s a piece of fun news, in case you missed it on Facebook or Twitter: I have finally hit that certain zine girl milestone and published a short story over at Storychord. It’s called “The Professor and the Bikini Waxer,” and I have my former compadres at nogoodforme.com to thank — the lovely Elizabeth Barker and Laura Jane Faulds, as well as their ace illustrator and partner in crime Jen May — since it’s part of a special issue curated by Strawberry Fields Whatever. I hardly ever submit to publications because my stories don’t ever quite fit and I honesty have no idea where to even begin, but this one did fit into the mold of a “literary fiction.” (Lack of goofball elements like werewolves helps.)

But it’s always a trip to publish anything, no matter where it ends up. It’s always very mortifying but the best part is: it’s truly done. The story is out there, it’s in the world and is ultimately completed when it’s in the imagination of people other than you. And that’s really why we fight so hard to publish as writers, I suppose — nothing ever feels truly complete until it’s being read by other people.

Now that my little story’s journey is complete, it’s nice to finally trace its arc from beginning to end. Usually I’m like a shark with writing; it’s easy for me to jump into the next project without looking back. But in the interest of growing as a writer and not wanting to commit the same mistakes again and again — or just being able to diagnose patterns as patterns, if you know what I mean — it’s nice to remember where a story began, the turns it took and how it finally rounded the bend. Whether a short story or an epic novel, it’s always a struggle in some way or another, no?

++++++++

Like a lot of my ideas, it began as a joke…this one was a crass half-joke on a shoot during film school. I was brainstorming ideas we could make with very few locations, and I thought it’d be funny to do a short or even a web series about a bikini waxer — a kind of wisewoman-savant that ladies would line up to talk to for her advice on life and men and everything else. I just thought the idea of this love and relationship guru existing in such a profession was a funny, fascinating concept. We never made the film, though I did outline it quickly. I think the outline still exists somewhere in Google Docs or Dropbox or whatever cloud service I was using at the time.

The idea of a bikini waxer as a central character stuck with me, though, even long after I left the film industry. At some point, perhaps about a year ago, I decided just to write it in short story form. It initially began as a lark, just a “see where this character takes me.” I thought it’d be a lighter story, like the genesis of the short film/web series idea, but then as I wrote, I thought about the profession itself: how does one end up waxing bikini lines for a living? What would it be like if you discovered that this was one of your talents in life? And what if no one in your immediate sphere recognized it as legit and valid? I thought it was such an odd yet dramatic conundrum. What kind of person would this be? Maybe slightly embarrassed? Maybe trying to compensate in some way or another? Maybe a bit recessive and shy? I didn’t know. I basically wrote to find out, cheating on my novel by drafting the short story. And of course, being me, it went into slightly darker, more alienated territory, because that’s how I roll when it comes to me and writing. And: I have a pervy, fucked-up sense of humor, and that always seems to come out in a weird way.

I’m embarrassed to say, though, that this story went through a hella amount of revisions — it only took a few days to write, but almost a year to revise. Embarrassing! But it’s like any matter of the heart — sometimes you need to let the truths settle in before you can approach anything at a new angle. And honestly, I thought the story was weird and I couldn’t figure out what it wanted to be. This weird ingredient — the lost Germanic warrior tribes my little bikini waxer dreams about — kept popping up and wouldn’t go away. And so did the image of these intellectuals floating above the sprawl of Los Angeles, swilling wine and talking Greek and Latin classics in some crazy modernist house nestled in the Hollywood hills. That image, transposing a weird East Coast sensibility into a denuded landscape devoid of history but full of a Didion-like glamour — kept lingering as well. I had all these elements that wanted to be together, but I couldn’t figure out how they related to each other. So I wrote and wrote and wrote until I kind of figured it out.

There was initially way more action, and in an odd, subdued way, it became slightly “Heart of Darkness”-y but in a Hollywood spa. (There was even a “Heart of Darkness”/”Apocalypse Now” moment where Nina, my waxer, smears her face and body with mud mask and stares into the mirror in a very Travis Bickle kind of moment.) I finished it, and then I left it alone for a good long awhile and basically forgot about it as I finished up revising my novel. But then I’d remember it, and I’d pick it up and take a stab at revising it every now and then — and slowly each element came into its proper place and proportion. I realized it was basically a “shift in consciousness” story — like so many of my short films! (Talk about tracing patterns!) Once I realized that, I stripped away much of the action, until the story focused on just those moments that considered her thoughts and feelings, and the incidents in the story that created the changes in consciousness she goes through. Sometimes you have a wide lens working; this one was a very tight macro one.

It’s a tricky business to write a character like this. She’s essentially a passive person, though she does act and make decisions — but those actions and choices generally preserved her status quo because she feared change. I actually had some weird residual film school guilt about her not being more “active” of a character, but then I realized: it’s writing, not film, and especially on a short story like this, the change in point-of-view and perspective is the fulcrum of the action. She actually doesn’t make any changes in her life in the story, but the tale is really about laying the groundwork in her heart and mind before she makes concrete changes in her life It’s just a moment, just an inhale before you leap from the precipice — but so much can change in a breath.

Writer’s Notebook: Flabby Middles and How to Tone Them

I hope you are “muamuamuaing” at the title of this post, because honestly, there is no easy workout for abs and also no easy solution for dealing with problems in the midsection of a novel. I am discovering this right now, as I wade through my umpteenth draft, tearing out my once lustrous hair with my once well-tended hands.

It was so easy to crank out a first draft of my novel: writing the middle was sort of do-do-dooping around, making stuff up, following the whims of an inner compass I called a character. But now I face rewriting and revision, where embedding one change means changing points A, B, and C in the middle — and oh, that means you might have to add this here to set up that there, but you need to take this out and then move it there…and oh, that means you might have to shift this a bit, but then you have to move that. And suddenly it’s like, whoa, this story’s suddenly looking very Frankenstein-like, and just kind of a mess.

There is actually very little discourse/advice/discussion on narrative midsections. After all, you often hear, “Oh, that’s a great beginning” or “Man, that ending killed me!” But do you ever hear, “WOW!! YOUR MIDDLE PASSAGE KNOCKED MY SOCKS OFF!!!” No, you don’t! So I’m kind of at sea here.

And it doesn’t help when I keep referring to writing books or asking other big-story-type writers about the midsection of a novel, and all I hear is variations of “The middle of a story kind of writes itself.” (That would be you, Mr. Stephen King, although On Writing is a great book on the craft of storytelling.) Sure, that’s true in a first draft (for me at least), but I’m finding the middle — otherwise often loftily known as “Act Two” — super-difficult to revise, particular the 2nd half of the act, which is always my personal bete noire as a writer, no matter what form I’m writing in.

I’m a bit stymied, so I recently hit the books as well as my past notes from screenwriting classes to guide me. The great thing about all my screenwriting classes was that there was a LOT of focus on Act Two. “Act two” is the longest section of a screenplay (it takes up about half of a typically 120-page script and sits right in the middle.) And it is where magically the parts of your story unfurl in a storm of action, drama and momentum…after carefully setting up your character, world and dilemmas, of course. That’s the ideal; the truth is that, as one of my mentors in school always said, Act Two is often where the most difficult problems lie. It is often what they call a shit pickle to deal with and troubleshoot. It’s easy for writers to lose steam for various reasons in Act Two when drafting, and it’s also easy to lose your way when you’re delving in the thickets of revision.

Anyway, I thought I’d set down a random collection of the most helpful thoughts, tips, tricks, etc. that I gathered on my little quest for salvation here. It’s funny to go back to all of this screenwriting stuff and apply it to a novel. But that’s one of the great gifts of screenwriting — it’s so stripped down to images, dialogue and action that it makes it easy to see how the endoskeleton of a narrative works and fits together. And screenwriting’s an eminently unsentimental discipline, and that’s a good attitude to take when you approach revision and find you have to “kill your darlings.” Yes, I’m a darling-murderer now, and hopefully this may help you in your own mission to destroy adorable though unnecessary darlings.

“HALF THE PROBLEMS IN ACT TWO ARISE BECAUSE YOUR ANTAGONIST SUCKS.”

I always hear this in my former prof’s voice. He was a tall, rangy, domineering man, a real New Yorker with a voice as big as Broadway, and he loved to terrify people, but in this very loving way. He loved telling people when something “sucked,” always making sure you understood that it wasn’t you sucking — and he did it with such humor and insight that you forgave him his bluntness. And he LOVED telling you when your antagonist sucked, because it gave him an opportunity to teach on a problem he saw as the one of the biggest mistakes for most writers. Some writers really hate thinking in such basic English-class terms, like they are too sophisticated for such things as “bad guys,” but simplicity’s a real gift when it comes to writing. If you don’t want to think of it as “the antagonist,” you can think of it as your main character’s opposing force — and they have to be strong enough to get in the way, to really exert force in your story and make stuff happen that will force your main character to make decisions and act. (Characters put the “act” in “Act Two.” How’s that for a writing nerd bumper sticker?)

Act Two is when your main character begins to engage with the larger world and struggle of the story — it’s when Frodo sets out for Rivendell in Lord of the Rings, when Isabel Archer meets the despicable Osmond in Portrait of a Lady, when Zoolander decides to get his place back in the modeling world. My lovely mentor, who passed away a few years ago, was always of the mind that most writers don’t think through the opposing force enough, especially on a first draft. We’re too busy trying to get to know our main characters, working out plot stuff, do-do-dooping around. And that’s all well and good, of course — characters are so important.

But it does help loads to devote a pass at your opposing forces — to make sure they’re properly introduced (if a character — it can be a world, for instance), have strong motivations lined out (hopefully going against your main character’s), and act and make decisions as strong as your protagonist. For my own last draft, I actually stumbled on a secondary antagonist in a later draft, and am now amping them up in my current revision pass — pulling them up higher in the story, getting clear on their goals and agendas, and all that fun stuff. So if you find you’re running out of steam in Act Two — either in the first draft phase or the revision phase — take a look at your antagonistic force and world and make sure they’re strong enough. If you were telling this story from their point of view, what would that look like? What decisions would they make?

ARE YOU STICKING TO THE MISSION? GET BACK TO YOUR MAIN TENSION!

Most Act Twos in traditional storytelling form deal with what fancy screenwriter types call the central question, or the “main tension.” This is the narrative thrust of the story: will Romeo and Juliet get and stay together? Will Isabel Archer succeed in her quest for independence and making her own mark? Will Zoolander reach the top ranks of the male model world once again? Novels may not cleave so tightly often to the central question/main tension, but in screenwriting it’s very, very often used, and often in editing, writers, directors and editors often strip away reams of story to focus on this spine — often to much better effect. Sometimes, if you find your story’s middle losing steam, it helps to remember what the central narrative dilemma/question/matter of your story is, and take out anything that doesn’t deal with it.

SOMETIMES YOU JUST HAVE TO BLOW STUFF UP, i.e., EMBRACING YOUR STORY’S BRAND OF CRAZY AND NOT REPEATING YOUR BEGINNING

I’ve written before about feeling embarrassed in some ways by your story and being shy or somehow weirded out by what you were writing — and about how you have to accept this in order to write freely and fulfill the demands that the story is asking you to engage with. We all have these unspoken rules we write by, like, “No, I am going to write a sophisticated werewolf novel — no crazy howling scenes for me!” Or unspoken embarrassment or shame, especially if you’re writing work that is deeply personal, intensely sexual or just emotionally honest. Sometimes this asserts itself in the level of plot or story — sometimes you don’t want to do something because it feels too unsubtle, or strange, or just plain nuts. But often my friends, if you’re avoiding doing something in your story — maybe, just like in real life, you should just do it. So many times I’ve been stuck writing because I haven’t wanted to do something that felt really kind of lunatic to me, or too revealing — but then I just write it out and, lo and behold, things get moving again.

The other half of this point actually comes from On Writing by Mr. Stephen King, who mentioned how much he wrestled with The Stand. He just got stuck, which understandably sucked for him, engaged in this huge apocalyptic epic on the scale of Tolkien or other grand fantasy and sci-fi masters. Finally he realized it was because he was repeating the same patterns that had set up the “fall” that began the novel to begin with — the characters were doing the same damn thing they did earlier. He needed to do something to shake it all up. So, [SPOILER ALERT! HIGHLIGHT THE BLANK SPACE IF YOU WANT TO KNOW] he blew up a bomb and blew up some characters, too. (This is not as unsubtle as you’d think — this actually fits well within the theme of The Stand.)

What I’m saying is that, sometimes dear writer, you have to blow something up, too. Of course, this doesn’t have to be literal — your story’s equivalent of a BIG ACTION or BIG EVENT is likely different, whether it’s a cutting remark (think Dr. Sloper’s remark to his daughter in Washington Square about being like a sheep) or attempting to kill the Prime Minister of Malaysia in a fit of brainwashed activation (ah, Zoolander). Similar to how you have an event that propels the protagonist into Act Two, you may need another catalyst to shake up the game going into the downhill slope of Act Two. If you can find this goalpost early on in the story process, you may save yourself a lot of agony in the revision. If not, no biggie, but using the revision process to pinpoint it may keep you on track when you’re most in danger of getting lost.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

So there you go, lessons I have absorbed and relearned and gone through (sometimes again) in the course of revising my novel! Which, by the way, I’m winding up, finally, truly, yaaaaaaay — after being put through my paces on the above, of course! And now I leave you with some Zoolander:

xo k.

Welcome to the Thunderdome, i.e. Revision is Hell

I finished the first pass of revising my novel! Because I miss being in artsy-fartsy school and don’t have class assignments, community and a teacher/mentor to bounce ideas/share the pain with, all my ruminations and observations on “process” are going to go here. Stats, pictures, notes, remembering what I did so I can not repeat mistakes, and keep doing the good of the good.

First step: Took a break! I figured I need space, just like any other dysfunctional relationship. Also, I had laundry to do, friends to email, nieces to bedazzle things with, sweethearts to tend to, birthday cards to send, i.e. LIFE.

Second step: Be scared and contemplate my future as a depressed, bitter boozehound. Truth is, while I am really good at cranking out isht, I have never been a great re-writer, mostly because I get lost in long-form projects like scripts. (Which aren’t long, relatively speaking, but are structurally intricate to the point of being architectural.) I had developed a process of multiple, multiple drafts of a screenplay, with each pass focusing on one or two aspects (one character, story events, dialogue.) But starting at the 110,000+ words, I knew that wouldn’t work for a novel. Doing ten to fifteen drafts of a novel? No wonder writers become alcoholics!

Third step: Figure out what my story is really about. The thing about screenwriting is that it’s a highly planned process for many writers — you spend a lot of time working on your structure and story before you type “FADE IN.” Your first draft can happen extremely quickly, and while you may make significant changes, you’ve spent tons of time and preparation already close to the imaginative heart of your story and what it is about. And even if there are significant changes, the form of a script is minimalist enough to do multiple surgeries upon. (And chances are, once you’re in production, there will be even more script emergencies to run the damn thing through the editing process again and again.)

But the first draft of a novel was a process of discovery in and of itself, and I found out that events that I had planned for didn’t quite fit as the story evolved. A whole new character emerged, and others changed from what I originally conceived. In that grand, coffee-fueled fugue state that was writing, certain exciting things happened in the story that I didn’t plan for, and other things didn’t work anymore. I had a hot mess on my hands. By the time I got done with the first draft, though, I had a much fuller understanding of the story and, more importantly, characters. I was totally in love with them, and my biggest feelings of failure came because I knew parts of the novel were not worthy of them! So I chose the most vital, exciting parts of the story that I knew I wanted to keep and decided to retool around these. Anchors, so to speak.

I also went back and figure out my simple story arc and theme, a kind of compass. Things I wish I did: wrote out a summary of the story, like the kind that you read on the back of a book. (Add that to the list for the next pass.)

Fourth step: Just start already. Since my previous revision process for screenwriting was not going to work the way it had before without a very good chance of me going bananas, I decided to try out a revision technique I had never done before, which was one extremely thorough, painstaking revision on the first pass. I knew what parts of the story felt strong to me, the parts that expressed closest the book in my heart I wanted to make. I knew my theme, the bigger thing the story was saying, I knew the story events that felt true to me, and even had a vague idea of what I knew I wanted to dump. So I started.

Fifth step: F*@! that. Well, actually, I did up focusing on story and plot most of all this round. (It’s the first thing I address in scripts when I revise — so much for trying to suppress my inner screenwriter.) I read each “scene” slowly and tried to decide if it was necessary, paying to attention to my weirdly imperative inner directive that there be something pulling the reader ahead in each one. (This is when it’s really great to have done so much screenwritng — this stuff comes more easily now.) I reworked phrasings and word choices, I honed characters and dialogue, I reshaped beginnings and endings, and did as much work as I could in each scene before I moved on. It was utterly exhausting. I did it all on the page and by hand, too, thinking that I wanted a tactile connection to writing. (Don’t you think a little different when you write by hand vs. being on a computer all the time?)

The only problem I had was when I had to significantly rework events in the book to fit with the parts I had discovered or decided were “true.” I got a notebook (from Muji!) and began putting any major new swaths of material in there. I used the notebook to basically document and chart stuff, everything from “Change Chewy’s hairstyle to a Mohawk throughout” to notes on historical fact-checking and the like. The notebook is kind of a work in and of itself. In a total hardcore move, I marked up various strands and aspects in different colored inks: pink for the love story (duh), green for skateboarding or diving stuff, blue for the bromance, etc. It was kind of both fun and a royal pain to keep this going, to the point where the cute barista at the Barnes & Nobles Cafe I worked at said I looked like a weird scientist who likes office supplies and kindergarten. I’ll take what I can get, I guess, especially from cute baristas.

Sixth step: Type in changes. SO BORING AND IT TOOK FOREVER. Seriously, it took WEEKS. I wanted to just KILL MYSELF and DRINK HEAVILY through it all. So much so that I think I am going to work on my next pass on the old ball-and-chain, i.e. laptop, to avoid this step again. The only great thing about it was the good opportunity to refine word choices again and again.

Now I am done with my first major revision! Accomplishments: cut about 20,000 words. Conclusions: colored inks work! Seriously, it was so much faster to find connected changes that I needed to line up against one another. Also: I hate entering things on the computer. Next: will start on the second revision soon. Hope: it won’t be as grueling as this one. L’aventure commence…