Posts Tagged ‘process’

Revision is hell: in which I reveal how crazy I truly am

I’ve hit a rough patch with my novel lately. Part of it is energy and working, and trying to balance a million priorities within the same 24 hours as everyone else. Part of it is that I’m at what I’ve learned is my weak spot in a story (the bit right before the third act turning point.) But it’s really because I am S-T-U-C-K. Stuck! I keep hitting dead ends, reversing tack and trying new things, hitting awesome NEW walls, going into tailspins and, whoa, new incontrovertibly impenetrable dead ends! Isn’t writing just awesome?

Of course, I know this is part of the process — doing hard time in an MFA program got me well acquainted with the ups and downs of long-form writing and revising. It’s still hard when you go through it, though: the doubt, the uncertainty, the cloud of irritation, general spaciness and questionable grooming (non)choices you exist under as you try to slog your way through a bog of narrative issues.

Besides the agonizing issues of “Should my werewolf disappear before or after the mysterious appearance of the clan chieftain?” or “Should I kill off the best friend in view of the protagonist or maybe I should have it discovered by her boyfriend, this precipitating the shapeshifter equivalent of the nervous breakdown?”, the hardest thing is feeling like I’m wasting time going in wrong directions. For this draft of this section, I’ve already burned through 10,000 words that have gone nowhere — investigations and explorations into new threads of stories, expanding moments that I thought were key but now seem secondary, and a whole scene involving an oral report on John Milton’s Paradise Lost that is really an apology and declaration of love. (It sounded good in my head.)

I keep trying to remember that it’s okay to go “nowhere” in stories — that, as Kanye West likes to tweet, #ITSAPROCESS, because your characters, if they’re good, will always have something to reveal when you’re writing. But after awhile, encouraging tweets/mantras only go so far, and soon you’ll resort to doing crazy things like talking to your characters to get through these rough patches.

Which is actually what I did last weekend after a whole week of eking out nonprogress on my book. Five whole days of sitting down for hours at my laptop after whole days of being chained to a computer for my job resulted in nothing but frustration. It really made me want to throw myself under the train. After I couldn’t take it anymore, I went for my daily walk, my head too full of that fog of frustration to really notice that it was the first truly glorious day of spring. (Yet another item to add to my “Why I sometimes hate my novel” list.) I tramped along, stewing over how much I hated myself for being such a fuck-up and Why weren’t my characters behaving?!!

I was loping along when suddenly I had this strange thought: that I was walking exactly like my werewolf prince, sort of hunched over, brow furrowed, preoccupied. (You don’t know how many times I’ve written that he’s furrowed his brow. He’s a brow-furrower. It’s his thing. On him, it’s sexy. On me, it makes me look oddly hungry.) And then — and here’s where I reveal what a lunatic I am — it was as if he was there beside me, both of us just strolling along on a fine spring day. Well, if he’s here, I thought to myself, I may as well ask WTF is going on with him right now. And so we had a chat, and it turns out that even though he was plotting his disappearance from my story, it didn’t mean that I could stop being in touch with his point of view. He kind of glowered about it (he’s kind of broody that way), but he had a good point: characters’ opposing choices often fuel a narrative’s energy. And so for the rest of the walk we talked about what was happening with him, how that affected my protagonist (she joined us at some point but being a cool, independent sort, she had other things to do), and a few other things.

When I was a kid, I used to talk in my head to imaginary people all the time. Everyone assumed that I would outgrow this. Apparently, I have not.

I don’t think I’m the only writer who’s ever chatted in my head with my characters, though I’m pretty aware that it makes me sound certifiable or at least very New Age-y. But sometimes it’s good to get a reminder that 1. it’s important to understand your “antagonist”; 2. it’s good to take walks; and 3. in some subconscious level, you’re not totally in control of the story. And if it takes having long, intense discussions with your characters in your head, well, I’d gladly pay a price of seeming like a literary looneybin in order to zoom forward with 10,000 more words of solid writing that actually does something.

++++++++++

And if all else fails, this TED video was a good reminder that being “wrong” is actually a valuable learning process. (When she gets to 13:26, she goes into the particular way “wrongness” works with stories, via examples of “This American Life.”)

And of course, this old favorite from J.K. Rowling, on the benefits of failure:

J.K. Rowling Speaks at Harvard Commencement from Harvard Magazine on Vimeo.

Welcome to the Thunderdome, i.e. Revision is Hell

I finished the first pass of revising my novel! Because I miss being in artsy-fartsy school and don’t have class assignments, community and a teacher/mentor to bounce ideas/share the pain with, all my ruminations and observations on “process” are going to go here. Stats, pictures, notes, remembering what I did so I can not repeat mistakes, and keep doing the good of the good.

First step: Took a break! I figured I need space, just like any other dysfunctional relationship. Also, I had laundry to do, friends to email, nieces to bedazzle things with, sweethearts to tend to, birthday cards to send, i.e. LIFE.

Second step: Be scared and contemplate my future as a depressed, bitter boozehound. Truth is, while I am really good at cranking out isht, I have never been a great re-writer, mostly because I get lost in long-form projects like scripts. (Which aren’t long, relatively speaking, but are structurally intricate to the point of being architectural.) I had developed a process of multiple, multiple drafts of a screenplay, with each pass focusing on one or two aspects (one character, story events, dialogue.) But starting at the 110,000+ words, I knew that wouldn’t work for a novel. Doing ten to fifteen drafts of a novel? No wonder writers become alcoholics!

Third step: Figure out what my story is really about. The thing about screenwriting is that it’s a highly planned process for many writers — you spend a lot of time working on your structure and story before you type “FADE IN.” Your first draft can happen extremely quickly, and while you may make significant changes, you’ve spent tons of time and preparation already close to the imaginative heart of your story and what it is about. And even if there are significant changes, the form of a script is minimalist enough to do multiple surgeries upon. (And chances are, once you’re in production, there will be even more script emergencies to run the damn thing through the editing process again and again.)

But the first draft of a novel was a process of discovery in and of itself, and I found out that events that I had planned for didn’t quite fit as the story evolved. A whole new character emerged, and others changed from what I originally conceived. In that grand, coffee-fueled fugue state that was writing, certain exciting things happened in the story that I didn’t plan for, and other things didn’t work anymore. I had a hot mess on my hands. By the time I got done with the first draft, though, I had a much fuller understanding of the story and, more importantly, characters. I was totally in love with them, and my biggest feelings of failure came because I knew parts of the novel were not worthy of them! So I chose the most vital, exciting parts of the story that I knew I wanted to keep and decided to retool around these. Anchors, so to speak.

I also went back and figure out my simple story arc and theme, a kind of compass. Things I wish I did: wrote out a summary of the story, like the kind that you read on the back of a book. (Add that to the list for the next pass.)

Fourth step: Just start already. Since my previous revision process for screenwriting was not going to work the way it had before without a very good chance of me going bananas, I decided to try out a revision technique I had never done before, which was one extremely thorough, painstaking revision on the first pass. I knew what parts of the story felt strong to me, the parts that expressed closest the book in my heart I wanted to make. I knew my theme, the bigger thing the story was saying, I knew the story events that felt true to me, and even had a vague idea of what I knew I wanted to dump. So I started.

Fifth step: F*@! that. Well, actually, I did up focusing on story and plot most of all this round. (It’s the first thing I address in scripts when I revise — so much for trying to suppress my inner screenwriter.) I read each “scene” slowly and tried to decide if it was necessary, paying to attention to my weirdly imperative inner directive that there be something pulling the reader ahead in each one. (This is when it’s really great to have done so much screenwritng — this stuff comes more easily now.) I reworked phrasings and word choices, I honed characters and dialogue, I reshaped beginnings and endings, and did as much work as I could in each scene before I moved on. It was utterly exhausting. I did it all on the page and by hand, too, thinking that I wanted a tactile connection to writing. (Don’t you think a little different when you write by hand vs. being on a computer all the time?)

The only problem I had was when I had to significantly rework events in the book to fit with the parts I had discovered or decided were “true.” I got a notebook (from Muji!) and began putting any major new swaths of material in there. I used the notebook to basically document and chart stuff, everything from “Change Chewy’s hairstyle to a Mohawk throughout” to notes on historical fact-checking and the like. The notebook is kind of a work in and of itself. In a total hardcore move, I marked up various strands and aspects in different colored inks: pink for the love story (duh), green for skateboarding or diving stuff, blue for the bromance, etc. It was kind of both fun and a royal pain to keep this going, to the point where the cute barista at the Barnes & Nobles Cafe I worked at said I looked like a weird scientist who likes office supplies and kindergarten. I’ll take what I can get, I guess, especially from cute baristas.

Sixth step: Type in changes. SO BORING AND IT TOOK FOREVER. Seriously, it took WEEKS. I wanted to just KILL MYSELF and DRINK HEAVILY through it all. So much so that I think I am going to work on my next pass on the old ball-and-chain, i.e. laptop, to avoid this step again. The only great thing about it was the good opportunity to refine word choices again and again.

Now I am done with my first major revision! Accomplishments: cut about 20,000 words. Conclusions: colored inks work! Seriously, it was so much faster to find connected changes that I needed to line up against one another. Also: I hate entering things on the computer. Next: will start on the second revision soon. Hope: it won’t be as grueling as this one. L’aventure commence…

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...